Standing in solidarity with Greenpeace amid SLAPP verdict
News
World Animal Protection stands in solidarity with Greenpeace after a US court orders it to pay $660M in a SLAPP lawsuit.
In a landmark decision with far-reaching implications for environmental activism and free speech, a North Dakota jury has ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline.
The verdict stems from allegations of defamation and incitement during the 2016-2017 protests against the pipeline's construction, which saw significant participation from Indigenous communities and environmental groups.
Greenpeace has announced plans to appeal the decision, citing concerns over biased jury selection and the trial's fairness.
Understanding SLAPPs and their impact on NGOs
This case is widely viewed as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP), a legal tactic employed by corporations to intimidate and silence critics through costly and prolonged litigation.
SLAPPs pose a significant threat to free speech and democratic engagement, targeting not only environmental organisations but also journalists, activists, and NGOs.
The primary objective of such lawsuits is not necessarily to win on legal grounds but to burden opponents with legal expenses and deter them from future activism.
The implications of the Greenpeace case for civil society
The recent verdict against Greenpeace sets a concerning precedent for NGOs worldwide.
If corporations can leverage SLAPPs to impose crippling financial penalties on organisations advocating for environmental and social justice, it could lead to a chilling effect where NGOs may hesitate to hold powerful entities accountable.
This undermines the foundational principles of democracy, where civil society plays a crucial role in checks and balances.
At World Animal Protection, we are deeply troubled by the outcome of this case.
We stand in solidarity with Greenpeace and reaffirm our commitment to defending the rights of organisations and individuals to advocate for environmental and animal welfare without fear of retribution.
The use of SLAPPs to suppress legitimate activism is an affront to justice and democracy.
Supporting Greenpeace and global activism
The verdict against Greenpeace is not just a setback for one organisation but a warning to all who champion environmental and social causes.
World Animal Protection remains steadfast in its support for Greenpeace and all entities facing unjust legal challenges.
Together, we will continue to fight for a world where advocacy is celebrated, not punished.
Related Content
World Animal Protection Climate Change Hub
Discover everything that World Animal Protection is doing to tackle the climate crisis and what you can do to help.
Take action
Fired up and ready to take action? Support our current campaigns to create a world where animal suffering is never acceptable.
Factory farming: the real climate culprit
Blog
Explore our reports on factory farming and discover why governments need to act to protect our climate, wildlife habitats and farmed animals.
